Happy Opening Day! My 2019 Season Predictions

It’s opening day! Every team (except for the A’s and Mariners*) begins with a clean slate and dreams of making the playoffs. Here are my predictions for the 2019 Division winners and Wild Card teams:

American League East: Yankees

American League Central: Indians

American League West: Astros

Wild Card 1: Red Sox

Wild Card 2: Angels

 

National League East: Nationals

National League Central: Brewers

National League West: Dodgers

Wild Card 1: Phillies

Wild Card 2: Giants

A note on my pick for the Giants to win one of the Wild Card spots, since some will dismiss this as overly optimistic: Bruce Bochy enters his final year as a manager and sits 18 games under .500 with a record of 1926-1944. It’s a tall order for the Giants to end the regular season with the 99-63 record needed to pull the skipper out of a losing record, but the Giants know that this is Bochy’s farewell tour and if there’s anyone who can get the most out of his players, it’s him. 

Manager of the Year:

Building on my optimism for a winning season in San Francisco, I am predicting Bruce Bochy as the NL Manager of the Year. For the AL, I will go with Angels skipper Brad Asmus. Riding the record deal with Mike Trout, the Angels will put together the pieces for a playoff run. If you’re wondering if I’m biased to think former catchers make the best managers, you’re probably right.

Cy Young Winner:

American League: Trevor Bauer, Indians (mostly because of the great first name)

National League: Madison Bumgarner, Giants

MVP:

American League: Mike Trout, Angels

National League: Anthony Rendon, Nationals

*The A’s and Mariners have already logged their first two games of the season in Japan. The Mariners took the two game set and now sit atop the standings 2-0 while the A’s have the misfortune of starting Opening Day in last place. I am not a fan of this. Opening Day is a tradition in baseball, and starting the season early to play internationally takes away from that. It’s fine to build some international games into the schedule, but they shouldn’t come before the rest of the regular season begins.  

Are you really that offended by your college’s mascot?

Apparently, George Washington is an offensive mascot. As reported by Campus Reform, students at George Washington University are petitioning to have the name changed on the grounds that the “Colonial” mascot may not be “the best identity for community school spirit.”

Source: Fox & Friends Facebook Page

One of the students interviewed in the Campus Reform video claimed, “there are students on this campus who don’t feel comfortable with it, so then, it doesn’t really matter what other students think.” To me, this raises the question, how offended can someone really be? Didn’t they voluntarily enroll at GW knowing full well that the mascot is the “Colonial”?

By all means, let’s have the debate over “offensive” mascots. But arguing that some are offended does not really justify a change. For one, it ignores the opinions of those who don’t have a problem, or even like the mascot. And what’s more, those who are offended by the name are not obliged to attend an institution whose traditions make them uncomfortable. With some 5,300 colleges to choose from, enrollees are hardly coerced to study there.

The offended students would do well to remember that they chose to enroll at GW University, “Colonial” mascot and all. If they had any qualms about the mascot, they clearly weren’t that significant. By enrolling, those students implicitly ranked their discomfort with the school’s mascot on a lower rung when considering the myriad trade-offs prospective students face. Had it been an important enough issue, the students would have given better consideration to that factor when making their enrollment decision.

This is not to say that schools and teams shouldn’t undergo name changes. As the GW Libraries website points out, the “Colonials” was not the original name used to refer to GW’s sports teams and the school itself was not always George Washington University. But the decision should not hinge on the discomfort of a few students.

As for ascribing the “Colonial” mascot to GW sports teams, a 1926 editorial from the school newspaper, The Hatchet, offers a pretty solid explanation for the name:

What name could be more fitting? This, the school named after George Washington, and having as its colors the Continental Army buff and blue, the colors of Colonial America, should be entitled to bear the name of “Colonials” if any school is so entitled. George Washington University, in its antecedents, is a colonial school. Dating back to very early post-Revolutionary days, it was founded when the term “colonial” still applied to an era which was then passing. Let us then, in just regard for our precious heritage, adopt as the name for the warriors wearing the Buff and Blue the term “Colonials.”

Excerpt from an editorial in the Hatchet from October 27, 1926. Source: https://library.gwu.edu/scrc/university-archives/gw-history/nicknames-and-mascots

New op-ed posted by the Washington Examiner – Taxes talk, but players like Bryce Harper still want to play where their lights shine brightest

Yesterday the Washington Examiner published by opinion piece on Bryce Harper’s decision to sign with the Philadelphia Phillies. Some think taxes played a big role and even Harper’s agent hinted that it was a consideration. Read the post on washingtonexaminer.com to get my thoughts.